|
Introduction
@
What is the Synergy of Arts and Sciences
(SAS)
Fig. 1
The synergy
of two branches forms SAS
@
Table 1
Examples of themes for four methodologies of SAS
@
Features of two
branches
@
Table 2
Features of typical disciplines of two branches
@
@
Information
on ISAS
@
@
@
Activities
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
return
to the top
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
return
to the top
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
return
to the top
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
@
return
to the top |
Introduction
In 1959 C.P.Snow published a book
titled gThe Two Culturesh. On the one hand, there were the literary
intellectuals and on the other, the scientists. He warned that literary
intellectuals were not at all communicating with scientists, and vice versa.
In the next book gThe Two Cultures: A Second Lookh, Snow expected
the arrival of a new culture which could bridge the two
cultures. Recently, such interdisciplinary attempts as complexity attracted much attention, and such titled book as
gThe
Third Cultureh was published. However, in my opinion, these attempts
are too basic to realize new culture which Snow suggested. The
two-culture problem is especially serious in Japan. In most Japanese high
schools, students are divided into two courses from the first or the second
grade: gliterary courseh and gscience courseh. This is because subjects of the
examination for admission to universities differ between the two courses. In
literary faculties namely faculties of social and human sciences,
subjects of examination cover in general English, Japanese and Civics. On the other hand, those in scientific
faculties namely faculties of
science and technology cover in general English, Mathematics and selection
among Physics, Chemistry and Biology. Japanese young students therefore
usually learn only a few subjects in high schools. Moreover, after the
entrance in the specific faculty of the university they learn more about
their major fields than the liberal arts. Their visions are apprehended to
become narrower and narrower in spite of the social needs of wide-view
persons accompanying as the modern complicated society. In fact, the result
of the survey by OECD showed that the ratios of citizens who are interested
in science and technology, and who have certain amount of scientific knowledges were lowest for
Japanese citizens in OECD countries.
What is the Synergy of Arts and Sciences (SAS)
In Japan, each discipline has in general been
divided into two branches, namely gliterary branchh and gscience branchh. Literary branch" includes social and human sciences and science
branch", natural science and technology. These two branches have
formed very firm two cultures" where two persons met first on
business exchange such greetings as which branch did you graduated
from?". So far two branches have been completely separated in
higher education and academic world. However, recent complicated
society claims the close relation between the two. Fig. 1 shows
a molecular model of the synergy of arts and sciences (SAS). It
will be understood that there appear four
methodologies:
@@@@@@ @@@@@@@@@@@@Fig. 1 The synergy
of two branches forms SAS
transdisciplinary domain spread over two
branches, interdisciplinary domain existing between the two and
mutual applications of one branch to the other two-sided arrow). Concrete
examples of themes for these methodologies are shown in Table 1. Here,
recently emerging problems only are enumerated. Traditional SAS subjects such
as economics, operations research, management engineering, science history,
scientific philosophy, industrial design etc are neglected.
Table 1
Examples of themes for four methodologies of SAS
|
Methodologies
|
Examples of Themes
|
The application of literary method to science branch |
Life-medical ethics,
Environmental ethics sensitivity
engineering
Accountability of scientist and engineer problems of
aging society
|
The
application of scientific method to literary
branch |
Applications of concepts of
mathematics,
Physics, Chemistry and Biology complexity |
| Interdisciplinary domain |
Human science
in general Physio-psychological problems |
| Transdisciplinary domain |
Social
biology Earth-environmental problems Problems of information
society Problems of civilization in general |
Features of two branches
Besides
above mentioned typical themes, there must be numerous SAS problems
individually. It will therefore be very useful in order to establish SAS if
we can grasp the typical features of two branches. We choose four pairs of keywords; objects
are nature and matter/human and society, objective (positive)/subjective, causally
explain/understand in value and
law-establishing/individually describing. In Table 2, a few typical
disciplines are chosen for two branches. For science branch, general terms
science and technology are given. Literary branch is divided into social and
human sciences. Former typical disciplines are economics and sociology.
Latter typical ones are psychology, history, literature and art. For
each discipline nearly applicable keywords are noted by circular sign and partially
applicable keywords by triangular one. Blank means almost inapplicable. It is clearly seen that science and technology make nature
and matter objects and are objective, causally explaining and
law-establishing. On the other hand, although main objects of
literary branch are human and society, most disciplines share
remaining three pairs of keywords except literature and art. It
will therefore be quite difficult to define literary branch clearly using
these keywords. It seems appropriate to define science branch as fields
studying nature and matter objectively and law-establishingly", and literary
branch just simply as fields mainly studying human and society.
Table 2 Features of typical disciplines of two branches
|
Keywords
|
Science and Technology |
Social Sciences |
Human Sciences |
| Economics |
Sociology |
Psychology History |
Literature and Art |
Objects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature, Matter Human, Society
Objective (positive) Subjective
Causally explain Understand in value
Law-establishing Individually describing
|
|
’
’
’
’
|
’
’
’ ’
’ ’
|
’
’
’ ’
’ ’
|
’
|
(notes) Fnearly applicable,
’Fpartially applicable
@
Information on
ISAS
Based upon the above mentioned thought, we decided to establish
a new institute where the two branches are united, synthesized
and cooperated to solve such complicated problems as earth environments,
life-medical ethics, network society and many other ones. This institute was
founded and named gInstitute for the Synergy of Arts and Sciences (ISAS)h in
October 23, 1996. Now the number of members counts more than 400
persons.
Activities 1. Annual
meeting (twice a year)
2. Publication of a journal (in Japanese, twice a year) 3. Set up of
societies for the study of particular themes
Membership dues a year
Individual: \5,000, Students: \3,000, Legal Person: \100,000
Secretariat ISAS
Department of Biological Science and
Technology,
School of High-Technology for Human Welfare, Tokai University
Nishino 317, Numazu, Shizuoka, 410-0395 Japan Tel:0559-68-1111,
Fax:0559-68-1156
E-mail: isas@sasrc.jp
Homepage: http://www.sasrc.jp/HP_Eng_1.htm
Chairman Dr.
M..Takatsuji Visiting Professor of Tokyo University of Agriculture
References M. Takatsuji: The Way
of Thinking based on the Synergy of Arts and Sciences:
Application to Psychocritique
- Junichiro Tanizaki Ukio Mishima, Lautréamont
-
(Synergy Research Center, 2004, 2nd edition 2007, in Japanese)
M. Takatsuji: Concept of the Synergy of Arts and
Sciences (Maruzen, 1998, in Japanese) M. Takatsuji: The Way of Thinking
towards the Synergy of Knowledges
(Tokai University Press, 2000, in
Japanese)
|